Cybernetics and Urban Systems Planning
Abstract
Cities are spaces in which political, economic and social organizations interact in different ways with their infrastructure, services and spaces. These elements make urban systems more complex and susceptible to the influence of several variables that can change their organization. Technology, fueled by a growing range of data, emerges as an inherent and emerging modifying factor in this system of conditions that are not always subject to control. Cybernetics studies provide directions for the systems control and communication, and their focus is centered on processing the acquired information and responding to these changes. Thus, this article seeks to offer a cybernetic perspective on the understanding of these complexity factors and how they can reveal paths to an open and self-organized urban planning, in which city systems can be more adaptable to the various transformations in a similar pace. The cybernetics proposal is to highlight a city with adaptive potential and that makes use of technology, not depending on the amount implemented, but on how to use it.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ALEXANDER, C. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings and Construction. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
ASHBY, W. R. Introduction to Cybernetics. Londres: Chapman & Hall, 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5851
CARPO, M. Digital Style. Log 23, pp.41-52, 2017.
GEORGALI, V. Data – Driven Urbanism: do we still need planners? Questioning the future of urbanism and the right to the digital city in the big data era. Delft: Essay for the Honours programme - TU Delft, 2017.
GERSHENSON, C. The Implications of Interactions for Science and Philosophy. Foundations of Science, Vol. 18 (4), pp. 781-790, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9305-8
GERSHENSON, C.; SANTI, P.; RATTI, C. Adaptative Cities: A Cybernetic Perspective On Urban Systems. ArXiv, pp. 1-15, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307896433_Adaptive_Cities_A_Cybernetic_Perspective_on_Urban_Systems. Acesso em: 28 set 2021.
GREENFIELD, A. Against the Smart City. Nova York: Do Projects, 2013.
HELBING, D. Globally Networked Risks and How to Respond. Nature, Vol. 497 (7447), pp. 51-59, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12047
HEYLIGHEN, F.; JOSLYN, C. Cybernetics and Second-Order Cybernetics. Nova York: R. A. Meyers, Enciclopedia of Physical Science & Technology, 2001.
HILLIER, B. Space is The Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KHANNA, P. Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization. Nova York: Random House Publishing Group, 2016.
KITCHIN, R. The Ethics of Smart Cities and Urban Science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society – A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374 (2083), 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0115
KRIVÝ, M. Towards a critique of Cybernetic Urbanism: The SmartCity and the Society of Control. Planning Theory, Vol. 17 (1), pp. 8-30, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216645631
KWINTER, S. FABRICIUS, D. Urbanism: An Archivistic Art?. In: Mutations. Barcelona: Actar, 2001.
MENONI, S.; ATUN, F. Cities: Places of Complexity. In: Handbook on Culture and Urban Disaster. Cities and DRR 3, 2017. Disponível em: http://educenhandbook.eu/sec3-cities-and-drr/. Acesso em: 28/07/2021.
NEGROPONTE, N. Soft Architecture Machines. Massachussets: The MIT Press, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6317.001.0001
NOVIKOV, D. Laws, Regularities and Principles of Control. Cybernetics, pp. 27-38, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27397-6_3
PANGAROO, P. Cybernetics as Phoenix: Why Ashes, What New Life? Cybernetics State of Art, Vol. 1, pp. 16-33, 2017.
PASK, G. The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. Londres: Architectural Design, 1969.
PORTUGALI, J. Complexity Theories of Cities: Implications to Urban Planning. Berlin: Springer, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, pp. 221-244, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_13
SÁ, A. I. Cidades de Código Aberto: Por um Urbanismo de Segunda Ordem. V!RUS, n.10, pp. 1-15, 2014.
SASSEN, S. Open Sourcing the Neighbourhood. Forbes, out 2013. Disponível em: http://www.forbes.com/sites/techonomy/2013/11/10/open-sourcing-the-neighborhood/. Acesso em: 28/07/2021.
SOUZA, M. L. Mudar a Cidade: Uma Introdução Crítica ao Planejamento e à Gestão Urbana, Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2013.
VANOLO, A. Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, Vol. 51 (5), pp. 883-898, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427
VEREBES, T. Masterplanning the Adaptive City: Computational Urbanism in the Twenty-First Century. Londres: Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428054
VON FOERSTER, H. Ethics and Second-Order Cybernetics. In: Understanding Understanding. Nova York: Springer, 1991.
WERNER, L. C. Cybernetification I: Cybernetics Feedback Netgraft In Architecture. Cybernetics: State of Art, Vol. 1, pp. 58-73, 2017.
WIENER, N. Cybernetics: Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Paris: Herman & Cie, 1945.
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Caio Augusto Rabite de Almeida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.